BALKAN ROUTE
The people traveling irregularly along the Balkan route carry stories forged in crisis. They come from places where conflict grinds on relentlessly, where repression stifles hope, where economies barely function, and where legal rights exist more in theory than practice. Syria and Afghanistan dominate the flow, both nations locked in cycles of violence and political chaos that make simply staying alive, let alone building a stable livelihood, an exhausting gamble. But the push factors go deeper than immediate danger. Across these regions, economic stagnation has become the norm, unemployment crushes aspirations, and young people see no viable future on the horizon. Families make the decision to migrate not just for safety, but because they dream of reuniting with loved ones already in Europe, accessing decent education and healthcare, and escaping the precarious legal limbo that defines life in countries of first refuge, places that were meant to be temporary havens but offer neither security nor opportunity.
The Western Balkan route continues to pulse with movement, as Frontex and EU border data make clear. In 2024 alone, approximately 6,800 people were detected entering Italy irregularly by land from Slovenia, with monthly arrivals typically hovering between 500 and 800. The human faces behind these numbers are diverse and often surprising: while many are adult men, there’s been a striking increase in women and children, including unaccompanied minors, particularly among Syrian and Afghan groups. In Trieste, the Italian gateway from Slovenia, the statistics reveal profound vulnerability: unaccompanied children comprised 16 percent of encounters (2,192 individuals), predominantly from Afghanistan. Families represented 17 percent, marking a 52 percent jump from 2023. Perhaps most dramatically, single women accounted for 4 percent of arrivals, a staggering 250 percent increase from the previous year. The largest groups originate from Afghanistan, Syria, Turkey, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.
The journey itself follows a well-worn but perilous path. Migrants typically enter the European Union from Turkey into Bulgaria, often through the border zone near Kapıkule/Kapitan Andreevo, then push northwest through the Western Balkans. From Bulgaria, the route threads through Serbia, sometimes diverting through North Macedonia or Bosnia and Herzegovina, before reaching Croatia. From there, it’s onward to Slovenia and then toward northern Italy or beyond.
For most asylum seekers and irregular migrants, especially those without visas or proper documentation, air travel and legal pathways are either unavailable or financially impossible. The Balkan route offers a land corridor where migrants can rely on transport networks, informal connections, and border crossing points that, despite intense enforcement, sometimes prove less controlled or more navigable than official visa regimes. Yet the risks have intensified: Frontex’s increased involvement and mounting reports of brutality by border personnel mean migrants face escalating dangers at every checkpoint. Many combine stretches of walking with periods of hiding or informal transport, choosing overland progression over sea crossings simply because the geography of the Balkan peninsula allows it, no maritime gamble required.
The dream destination for most is clear: Western and Northern European countries perceived to offer the most favorable asylum policies, genuine economic opportunities, and realistic chances for family reunification. Yet reality intervenes early and often. Actual entry and registration points cluster along the eastern and central EU periphery, Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovenia, where authorities first encounter migrants before any onward movement toward Italy and beyond becomes possible. Data on land entries into Italy from Slovenia shows arrivals concentrate initially along the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region border, after which people either disperse, file asylum claims in Italy, or attempt to continue northward. But reaching those intended final destinations has become increasingly difficult: tightened border controls and cooperation agreements between Croatia, Slovenia, and Italy mean many migrants face delays, violent pushbacks, or find themselves channeled into reception or detention facilities, bureaucratic and physical barriers that can stall or completely derail their journeys toward the futures they’ve risked everything to reach.
ASGI. (2025, September 4). Access to the territory and push backs, Italy. Asylum Information Database | European Council on Refugees and Exiles.
ECRE. (2025, January 23). Balkan route
European Border and Coast Guard Agency (2025, November 12). EU external borders: irregular crossings fall 22% in the first 10 months of 2025. *
Manojlovic. (2024). Refugees and migrants at the Balkans route regional overview 2023. Save the Children’s Resource Centre.
*A methodological note: Frontex data on irregular migration are widely used but politically influenced and methodologically limited. They record only detected crossings, often miss undetected attempts, and can overcount repeated entries, making absolute numbers unreliable. Despite this, they remain useful for tracking trends, identifying migration routes, and guiding EU border policy, serving as a centralized reference alongside UNHCR and IOM data.

